The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics
FROM
ISSUE
1757
In Brief: Apixaban vs Rivaroxaban for Acute VTE
PDF:   US English
Disclosures
Principal Faculty
  • Jean-Marie Pflomm, Pharm.D., Editor in Chief has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Additional Contributor(s)
  • Corinne Z. Morrison, Pharm.D., Associate Editor has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Objective(s)
Upon completion of this activity, the participant will be able to:
  1. Discuss the results of the COBRAA trial comparing the safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.
 Select a term to see related articles  apixaban   dabigatran   DOAC   edoxaban   Pradaxa   rivaroxaban   Savaysa   venous thromboembolism 
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2026 Jun 22;68(1757):103   doi:10.58347/tml.2026.1757f

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) apixaban (Eliquis) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto, and generics) are frequently used for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and are usually continued for at least 3 months.1 The other DOACs (edoxaban [Savaysa] and dabigatran [Pradaxa, and generics]) are alternatives for long-term treatment, but they require prior treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for ≥5 days.2 Until recently, no large randomized trial directly comparing the safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE was available.

HEAD-TO-HEAD TRIAL — In a prospective, open-label, blinded-outcome trial (COBRRA), 2760 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism or proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomized to receive 3 months' treatment with apixaban (10 mg twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg once daily). The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding), the primary endpoint, was significantly lower with apixaban than with rivaroxaban (3.3% vs 7.1%, RR 0.46 [95% CI 0.33-0.65]). Major bleeding occurred in 0.4% of patients taking apixaban and in 2.4% of those taking rivaroxaban (RR 0.16 [95% CI 0.06-0.40]) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 2.9% of patients taking apixaban and in 4.9% of those taking rivaroxaban (RR 0.59 [95% CI 0.40-0.86]). The authors state that most bleeding events with rivaroxaban occurred during the initial higher-dose phase. Rates of recurrent symptomatic VTE were similar in the two groups (1.1% with apixaban vs 1.0% with rivaroxaban (RR 1.08 [95% CI 0.52-2.23]). Mortality rates in both groups were low (<0.5% of patients); no deaths related to bleeding or recurrent VTE were reported.3

CONCLUSION — At the FDA-approved dosages that were studied in the COBRRA trial, apixaban appears to be safer than rivaroxaban for treatment of acute VTE.

  1. Drugs for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2022; 64:113.
  2. MA Creager et al. 2026 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ACEP/CHEST/SCAI/SHM/SIR/SVM/SVN guideline for the evaluation and management of acute pulmonary embolism in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2026; 153:e977. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001415
  3. LA Castellucci et al. Bleeding risk with apixaban vs. rivaroxaban in acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2026; 394:1051. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2510703
© The Medical Letter, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The Medical Letter, Inc. does not warrant that all the material in this publication is accurate and complete in every respect. The Medical Letter, Inc. and its editors shall not be held responsible for any damage resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission.
This article has been freely provided.
arrow to previous article
arrow to next article